Charlalottie on Twitter wrote:Just remembered that I played pool with a satanist last night. Really should go out on a Friday more often.
Charlalottie wrote:Had a good night last night. We lost the pub quiz but had my hair plaited by a viking.
Charlalottie on Twitter wrote:Just remembered that I played pool with a satanist last night. Really should go out on a Friday more often.
Charlalottie wrote:Had a good night last night. We lost the pub quiz but had my hair plaited by a viking.
Jimmers wrote:It's not so much about evidence - I don't know facts any more than any of you. I do remember at the time of the first lot of diary stuff there were allusions made to it being set in 1994, but there were odd, out of context things like "maybe he just had his phone switched off" - like all schoolboys at the time carried around those massive phones with suitcases to carry the 4 ton battery in. I got my first mobile in about '96, and it was massive and expensive.
Also there was some guff about the sister scribbling on a school book, and in some bit of banter she shouted to Laura "but I was 4!!!" - which would make her 15 or 16 now.
Really, I don't care about odd bits and pieces, it's the air of arrogance where these people think you'll swallow any old rubbish just because they say it's true. Another example was the original 5 Decades with Colin and Edith: they used to claim the songs were played at that exact minute on the day in history. You know damned well there weren't computers around in the early years, so did they expect us to believe that some YTS girl sat there and logged the times and dates of every song on a W H Smith scribbling pad just in case in 20 years someone invented the PC?
Again, not a big deal, but I object to not being given any credit to spot a blatant lie. Why bother? It doesn't make the feature any less worthy to have it as stuff played on that day - and the fact they said it, like with all the things on all shows that have holes in them, just makes me more cynical about other things that happen by some spooky coincidence.
And about the diary "not mattering" if it's fiction - it fecking well does matter, because they're about to take a large amount of cash on the basis of it being real. If the book says on it that it's fiction, then I'll be happy, but otherwise someone's going to spend a lot of money on a lie. Imagine you bought an autobiography for 20 quid and found out it just wasn't true.
It matters.
Charlalottie on Twitter wrote:Just remembered that I played pool with a satanist last night. Really should go out on a Friday more often.
Charlalottie wrote:Had a good night last night. We lost the pub quiz but had my hair plaited by a viking.
Yudster wrote:Maybe. But I still don't think so. Don't believe you either. And yes, I know I might be wrong, and if I were given proof, I would happily accept it - but you aren't going to be able to do that, so I still think the diaries are fiction. Which makes it all the more sad that they were not even remotely entertaining.
Bag for balls wrote:If you don't mind me asking Ralph, how do you know Laura?
(also Yudster is of the female variety, hence matess.)
Bag for balls wrote:Pleased to meet you, and fair do's about the "mate" statement.
I still think it's massively fake though, and very badly acted...... oh, and not very amusing to boot.
But that's just my opinion.
Bag for balls wrote:I don't know, and no offence, but someone on here saying they went to youth club with Laura doesn't do it for me I'm afraid, anyone could make that claim, and even so it still doesn't make it true. Even if you did know her as a young-un, and even if all the people in the diary exist, and even if you know them and indeed her....... the whole thing could still be scripted, and probably is..... have you seen the Usual Suspects????
By all means correct me, but as it stands with the evidence that I have, and having heard it a bit on the radio I feel that it is as scripted as the rest of the Scott Mills show, and poorly portrayed to the public.
ralph wrote:and your point is?
Bag for balls wrote:ralph wrote:and your point is?
My point is massive, and very elegant, although I've never heard it referred to as my "point", although I suppose it is pointy in some respect................... oh hang on, I think I've got my wires crossed here, sorry.
No I don't really have a point, if your answer had been "yes it is all uni based" then I was going down the line where I would have questioned you as to how you know "everyone" in the diary when you only supposedly knew Laura at youth club which insinuates that you knew her not at uni, i.e. how did you know the characters from uni.
However you didn't give me the answer I was after, so I shall avoid that line of questioning...... never mind.
ralph wrote:...... they were never written to be entertaining. i agree some of it was dull as but they were never intended to be disected or critiqued like this, just some ramblings of a teenager.
personally i think its good that Laura's turned it around and got something out of them being published - she's humiliated enough so fair play
Charlalottie on Twitter wrote:Just remembered that I played pool with a satanist last night. Really should go out on a Friday more often.
Charlalottie wrote:Had a good night last night. We lost the pub quiz but had my hair plaited by a viking.
That's everything up to Thursday done, I'll get t[…]